If you regularly drive along Jamboree Road from
the 73 Freeway to the coast you will have noticed some dramatic
changes at the uppermost end of the Back Bay. Sediment washed down
San Diego Creek has transformed areas of open water into mudflat.
| The channels around the two islands that are
protected nesting areas for the endangered California least
tern are filled in making the birds and their eggs vulnerable
to feral cats. Sediment carried down the Bay and out to the
ocean has impacted other habitats and species within the Upper
Newport Bay Ecological Reserve, created navigation problems in
the Lower Newport Bay, and has affected the Marine Refuges
along the Newport Coast. |
 |
The problems caused by the sediment led federal
and state agencies to classify it as a pollutant and set
requirements to reduce the influx into the Bay. One of these
requirements is to provide and maintain a capture basin of specified
depth at the entry of San Diego Creek. The existing basin was not
very efficient in dropping out sediment and it is now full.
Consequently for the last several years large amounts of sediment
have carried through and deposited further down the Bay at a rate as
high as six inches per year in some places.
The need for a long-term solution was
identified in the 1990’s, various studies were performed, and
alternate designs proposed. The outcome was a $38.5 million UNB
Ecosystem Restoration Project (“dredging project”) to be funded
65% by the federal government and 35% by local partners. The
groundbreaking ceremony took place on October 11, 2005. Senator
Dianne Feinstein was principal speaker.
In order for the project to be performed
efficiently, all of the roughly $13.5 million local share of the
funds was committed up-front. Yet only about half of the roughly $25
million federal share has been provided so far, and the crucial main
part of the project (the widening and deepening of the capture basin
at the entry of San Diego Creek to the Bay) continues to suffer from
delays. As a result the total project cost is now estimated at
roughly $45 million.
Potentially also, much of the restoration work
performed thus far with the local funds will be undone because the
much larger and more efficient capture basin will not have been
dredged. The recent wildfires that ravaged the foothills of the
Newport Bay watershed have left barren hillsides that are prone to
mudslide before new vegetation is established. If we have a wet
winter in the next several years, a major storm will almost
certainly dump a massive amount of sediment into the Bay. This is
bad news for the Bay, and a poor way to use tax and bond money.
Senator Feinstein and Congressman Ed Royce have
worked hard to include additional funds in the 2008/2009 federal
budget. The House Energy and
Water appropriations bill included $2 million for Upper Newport Bay
Ecosystem Restoration. The Senate version passed on July 10, 2008
included $3 million. To help fund the additional costs
grant applications have been made to the state Wildlife Conservation
Board for $4 million and the
US Fish and Wildlife Service for $1 million. But this is not
nearly enough given the escalating cost of the project. What is most
needed is for Congressman John Campbell to champion this project in
the House of Representatives. For more information on contacting Congressman Campbell, click
here.
|